Water Fueled Cars a Modern

by KC SUNSHINE

The subject of water fueled cars has been around for a very long time and is a widely debated subject. However, as a little known matter of fact most people don't even know or realize that the very first internal combustion engine powered automobile was invented by the Swiss inventor Isaac de Rivas in 1807. Which being in and of itself an incredible achievement seems to not even pale to the fact that it also turns out to be that what the engine used as fuel, (since gasoline wasn't invented until the 1870's) was amazingly, HYDROGEN extracted from WATER! [1]

Nowadays we still know that it's entirely possible to run a car on hydrogen. And although hydrogen gas has been proven to be 3 times more powerful than gasoline with the potential for its use as a fuel being enormous, it still has many drawbacks. For one thing, hydrogen, when contained and stored in large quantities, is very flammable and dangerous. Does anybody remember the Hindenburg?

Vehicles running with hydrogen in pressurized tanks have the potential of bursting into dangerous fireballs of combustible energy, especially during tragic automobile accidents. Even with advanced techniques of safety and procedures in place to protect the public, and even though hydrogen may seem to be ecologically and technologically the logical fuel right now for automobiles, there is no consumer distribution system in place.[2] Just the cost of building a hydrogen fueling infrastructure is an often a debated subject in and of itself. According to Larry Burns of General Motors "A network of 12,000 hydrogen stations in the United States would put 70 percent of the U.S. population within two miles of a fueling station. If the stations cost $2 million each (estimates for the cost of a station range from $1 million to $4 million) the network would cost about $24 billion."[3]

Also, currently with gasoline prices going through the roof and no definitive way of knowing what type of fueled vehicle will emerge as the dominant leader of the future, whether it be hydrogen, hydrogen fuel cells, methanol, ethanol or electric, it's now a time when many people are looking for any alternative means or method(s) to reduce the rapidly rising cost of gasoline.

This is where the often little known subject of HHO gas, or oxyhydrogen or Aquygen gas comes in. Oxyhydrogen is a mixture of hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) gases, typically in a 2:1 molar ratio, the same proportion as water, hence the chemical "graphic" formula designation of HHO.

The chemical "simple" formula for water is H2O. This chemical "simple" formula we ordinarily write for water conveys no information about the compound's structure- that is, the order in which the atoms are connected by bonding, or how they are arranged in three-dimensional space.

The chemical "graphic" formula for water however is HOH, which also means two parts of hydrogen to one part oxygen, however in the "graphic" formula the one line list of the elements is intended to show the actual physical orientation of the constituent atoms to one another, whereas in the "simple" formula the actual physical orientation of the atoms is left unknown.

In other words from the chemical "graphic" formula for water we can see that the water molecule has an atom of hydrogen to either side of the oxygen atom. But in the chemical "simple" formula, the arrangement of the water atoms is not conveyed. From the chemical "graphic" formula of HOH we can see that it depicts that the chemical substance of water has one hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a single oxygen atom on either side of it.

To expound now a little further, water is the chemical substance with the chemical "simple" formula of H2O: meaning one molecule of water has two hydrogen atoms covalently bonded to a single oxygen atom. Covalently bonded meaning that, the atoms share "valence" electrons between each other such as is discussed in valence bond theory. [4] In short, the attraction-to-repulsion stability that forms between atoms when they share electrons is known as covalent bonding.

Now, enter in American-Italian physicist Professor Ruggero Maria Santilli, proponent if not outright inventor of the theories of hadronic relativity, hadronic mechanics, and hadronic chemistry. There does not seem to exist any more serious of a candidate for a unified field theory about the physical universe than Professor Santilli. And it seems that since his theories fly in the face of traditional science and go against Einsteinian doctrines that Professor Santilli's knowledge has been suppressed and he has been oppressed.

Recommendation of Professor Santilli for the Nobel Prize in Physics was initiated in 1984, and was more recently joined with recommendations for the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. However the technical documentation of the nominations was ignored by the Nobel Foundation due to the granting of prizes in physics and chemistry under lack of solid foundations. [5] Currently the recommendations of Prof. Santilli for the 2007 Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry have since been rendered public.